|
dankodan42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Best late night comedian on TV...GO CRAIG!
BlaisePfeffer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Oh is it that old... I didn't realise, I found it from google looking for stuff about QoS
tamasisdk (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
lol hes god to make parody on q =)
Garrot10 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I agree...
Purplemonkeyspank (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i am a massive bond fan and at 1st i was a lil disapointed at the no gadget thing....but then i actualy watchd the film (casino royal) and realised that having no gadgets didnt make any diffrence t the film being kick ass man! These two films have amazing action, amazing stunts and the bond is more straight t the point. For me these two new bond films a far more enjoyable coz they'r that little bit mre believable. Roger more was the best eva bond but im starting t like dan craig more tho....
Purplemonkeyspank (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
lol Cocknys sound even worse man! Have you heard a cockny talk?!
swans1997 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Ok, how a about a Cokney then?
iPho3n1x (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
He was talking about Casino Royale. Not Quantum of Solace.
bullseyegurl (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think it makes him seem more charming than clever =)
BlaisePfeffer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It's true I just watched it (I know it hasn't officially come out in the US) It was a good movie but not really true to the James Bond spirit, It was action packed in a no decipherable plot kind of way but there were no gadgets at all (unless you count a camera phone) It was the same with Casino Royal(unless you count a AED) I am very disappointed, the gadgets are the best part of the movie usually. |